Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 00:57

Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
What can you do if you are a full-grown adult, but never experienced being a child?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
What are the best Jewish jokes?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
John Harbaugh on Aaron Rodgers: I don’t have a reaction, just respect - NBC Sports
Russia can stop this any time.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Thank you.
Just in the last 5 years:
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Why do a lot of autistic people not know how to style their hair?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Mundfish Reveals The Cube, An MMORPG Shooter Set In The Atomic Heart Universe - Game Informer
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
If there was only one man remaining on the Earth, would this be regarded as extinction?
What’s next?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Bruce Willis Enjoys 'Sunday Funday' With Family Amid Dementia Battle - Realtor.com